Delegates retain church’s homosexuality stance
May 4, 2004
By Linda Green and Kathy Gilbert*
 |
|
A UMNS photo by Mike DuBose.
The Rev. Eddie Fox watches General Conference vote on
Paragraph 161G. |
PITTSBURGH (UMNS) - Delegates to the United
Methodist Church’s top legislative body voted to retain the
denomination’s statement that homosexual practice is incompatible
with Christian teaching.
On May 4, delegates voted to slightly alter the current language in
the Social Principles.
They deleted the words "although we do not" from a sentence in
Paragraph 161G that goes on to say "condone the practice of
homosexuality…" The delegates approved a revision to the language,
which now says, "The United Methodist Church does not condone the
practice of homosexuality and considers this practice incompatible
with Christian teaching." They also added a clause that United
Methodists "will seek to live together in Christian community."
An original motion from the Church and Society Committee stated, "We
recognize that Christians disagree on the compatibility of
homosexual practice with Christian teaching." But delegates approved
a minority report that did not include that phrase. All legislation
brought to General Conference is processed through committees such
as Church and Society.
The Rev. Eddie Fox of Nashville, Tenn., said in a press conference
after the 579-376 vote that if the church had not retained the
language of Paragraph 161G of the Social Principles, that "serious
consequences could have happened (and) a possible hemorrhage could
have occurred."
 |
|
A UMNS photo by Paul Jeffrey.
Supporters wanting more inclusive
language protest General Conference decision. |
Fox said the church was in "desperate" need
of a clear, authoritative, declaratory statement made with
compassion. He spoke in the assembly in favor of the change.
Numerous delegates from Africa spoke against homosexuality and
requested that the church move forward in proclaiming the gospel.
One said that in African culture, it is "taboo" to speak about
sexuality. "We do not want to be drawn into the issue," said Kasap
‘Owan Tshibang of the church’s North Katanga Area in the Democratic
Republic of Congo.
Muland Aying Kambol, a delegate from the southern Congo asked if it
is "permissible to spend so much time speaking about sin." If that
is the vision of the church, he said, then "our church will surely
die."
Samuel Quire of Liberia stated that the church "cannot license
people to go to hell."
When asked if the approved statement was a response to the recent
acquittal of a lesbian pastor, Fox replied that the delegate’s
decision "is a response to all that has happened in society, in all
churches, including that trial." He spoke of the importance of a
clear statement from the United Methodist Church because it is being
watched by other denominations.
 |
|
A UMNS photo by Paul Jeffrey.
Bishop Donald A. Ott (right) picks up pieces of a communion
chalice intentionally broken during a protest at General
Conference. |
The Rev. James Preston of Rockford, Ill.,
said the adopted statement was not a message of compassion but one
that "clearly said that gays and lesbians are not welcome in the
church.
"Hemorrhaging has already occurred, and I assure you that following
this General Conference, quietly and with tears, we will splinter in
many divisions," he said. The church did not speak the truth about
itself and had a "healing option" but chose not to use it, he
stated.
The Rev. Margaret Mallory of Perrysburg, Ohio, reminded delegates
that the church is of two minds on the issue. "We do not become
‘less than’ because we admit that we disagree. In fact, we become
‘more than’ because we tell the truth and we live the truth."
Fox said the decision is a statement that is "important to the
ministry we do and focuses on the call to spread the gospel."
*Green and Gilbert are United Methodist News Service news
writers.
News media contact: (412) 325-6080 during General Conference, April
27-May 7. After May 10: (615) 742-5470.